K Motor vs R Question
Moderator: Moderators
-
motorcityrider
- Basic User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 3:22 am
K Motor vs R Question
I was considering getting a 2004 K1200GT. I haven't drove it yet but was wondering what are the main driveability differences between the R & K motors?
Re: K Motor vs R Question
The K models (flying brick) handle and drive very nicely. Very sturdy and almost unbreakable bikes. They are just so much heavier than the R models ...motorcityrider wrote:I was considering getting a 2004 K1200GT. I haven't drove it yet but was wondering what are the main driveability differences between the R & K motors?
Kind regards
Oliver
Re: K Motor vs R Question
They are both excellent designs, but as OMG1010 mentioned, there can be a big weight difference. I believe that's even the case when comparing the RR to the KR. Test ride both designs and decide for yourself which one you like best. The GT is a very nice bike; the fairings will add weight over other BMW models, but it's a high-end performance tourer.
Member #725
-
boxermania
- Quadruple Lifer
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:37 pm
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA.....aproaching retirement
Re: K Motor vs R Question
Aside from some FD failres on the earlier K's they seem to have better reliability than the R's.......
Member #312
06 Suzuki Burgman 650 "state of flux"
79 CBX
06 Suzuki Burgman 650 "state of flux"
79 CBX
Re: K Motor vs R Question
A K75 will last foreverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ........................boxermania wrote:Aside from some FD failres on the earlier K's they seem to have better reliability than the R's.......