Tigcraft wrote:The telelever works so well why did bmw discard it on the R9T series and more so on the LC boxers?
Lots of reasons:
Mainly because the 'market' doesn't like 'new' things.
It's heavier than telescopics so any bike with it fitted has a greater gross weight so comes across as heavier in media group tests and so it's something negative that the journalists can point to.
It provides feedback in a much more subtle fashion than telescopics so it's something negative that people (journalists especially, but also normal riders) can point to. (You only really appreciate the feedback from Telelever once you've had a good month or so on the bike, on a short test ride it feels like you are getting no feedback at all).
Race bikes don't have it, so 'bikers' think it's crap. (Race bikes are stripped to be as light as possible, and telescopics have about 100 years of development now so in overall terms they're more developed). On the road, where real riding is done, all that is irrelevant.
Some people don't like the fact that the bike's wheelbase actually lengthens when you brake, (although it's a good thing, makes the bike more stable on approach to a corner, albeit slightly slower to steer around the corner).
I'd also imagine that it's more expensive to make, and it's probably more expensive to maintain (when you take into account the fact that there are more bearings involved). The engine casings have to be designed differently (and more strongly) as well as all the other considerations.