Dr. Strangelove wrote:Hey, Joe,
Disclaimer: I have the flu and when I have fever I get dense(r) and stupid(er).
So, other than the lure of the strange (dopamine spikes are hard to resist) and aesthetics, what does the r9t offer that the new r12r would not?
I fully appreciate your reasons to retire your 12, but isn't the r9t arguably a step down? No hard case ava, only a sport screen, no linked brakes, no telelever. It may have all the quality Berlin is able to incorporate, but those things lacking seem important for long distance riding, at least to me. Coming back from Big Bend last week in 38 degree rain/sleet, I was glad I had all of those things, ie a big enough cee bailey screen, linked brakes, hard cases and telelever suspension.
Looking at it the other way, if you had a r9t for years and it was approaching retirement for the resaons you list, wouldn't all the things it lacks vis a vis the r12r make a compelling argument to get the r12r?
Not challenging your decision, but I'me sure you thought about these things?
John
Hi John,
I know what you mean about thinking straight when sick... hope you get well soon!
As for the decision to replace my 12R with the 9T, I don't believe it's a step down at all. To me the soul of the BMW roadster is in the boxer motor, not in the tele lever or linked brakes. Sure those features on my R have been great, but we have 3 other bikes in the garage with standard forks and brakes and I've never wished they had anything different.
To me, tele lever and linked brakes are more of a safety feature vs a performance/comfort feature, and I'm ready for better performance with more manual control and feedback from the bike.
Having a boxer motor on a simpler and more "standard" bike is just perfect for me at this point in time of my life, I want something new and different, but not too different. Like I said I really did keep an open mind when looking around for a replacement but nothing out there really was the whole package I'm interested in. A Classic would be great, but not really much different than my current bike, just newer.
As for long distance traveling, I've been doing quite a bit of it in the last few years on my Husaberg FE570, something I try to keep out of this forum since it's not the place for DS bike talk really. But, since I know I can accomplish and actually enjoy very long days riding on a small bike with no windscreen (record is 850 miles, many 500+ mile days) I see no issue with touring on a stock 9T and with time some screen options will come around, though I want nothing more than a sport screen or bikini fairing to keep the aesthetics in line with the design of the bike. My Rukka riding suit protects me from the elements 100% with or without a screen.
As mentioned I don't need hard cases for traveling at all, my multi-week camping pack fits into 33 liters of soft bag space after investing in very lightweight and compact camping gear, a necessity on a small bike. Security is no issue since I don't frequent places I need to be concerned about locking things up. Plus, when Nancy and I are traveling, we'll have hard cases just the same on the 12R.
Now, all what I just said to technically justify my trade of bikes is fine and dandy, but the most important thing is I LOVE the looks of the 9T over the current offerings of the 12R, by a long shot. I like nice things, I like the small details, I like being on something even more exclusive. It just fits my self image and any shortcomings in certain comparisons whether real or imagined I will deal with to own and ride one of these.
You gotta follow your heart and my heart is saying this is the bike for me.... until I feel it's time for something else. My 12R kept my heart happy for 7 years, a long time for an A.D.D person like myself but it's time for something new both technically and emotionally.
Thanks Steve!