Fuel Consumption - Surprising !

This section is dedicated to the new Rockster version of the R1150R.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
\\Mike_Lea//
Basic User
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:54 am

Fuel Consumption - Surprising !

Post by \\Mike_Lea// »

As I've not had the Rock for that long I wanted to get an idea of fuel consumption. Filled up literally to the brim then went out for a long ride taking in a mixture of roads, including motorways / major & minor roads etc.

As I rolled up back at the house, the fuel light came on with 165miles on the clock. Took the bike out again at the weekend ; didn't dare take too long a route to the petrol station, but as I pulled into the garage the clock read 175miles.

I managed to squeeze about 15.5ltrs in, so effectively 5ltrs left in the tank.

I was quite surprised by the fuel consumption... Approx. 50mpg ! So I should be able to clock up a max of 225miles, or perhaps 200miles safely on a long trip.

Does that add-up with everyone else out there ?

M :)
Shine on you crazy diamond
drevil
Basic User
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 8:57 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Laurel, MD

Post by drevil »

are these uk gallons? my rock is 40 or less for sure. maybe i'm just a crazy rider...
User avatar
\\Mike_Lea//
Basic User
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:54 am

Post by \\Mike_Lea// »

Yeh... Just been working it out now, converted the liters to Gallons ( imperial ) rather than US.

Pretty good ain't it. And to be honest I was really tankin' it most of the journey. Altho' I have read that the consumption improves at the higher constant speeds, which stands to reason I suppose ; bike getting to the optimal temp. etc.

M :)
Shine on you crazy diamond
MartyWadd
Basic User
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 11:50 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: San Diego, California

Post by MartyWadd »

I've had nothing near that. My light comes on about 100-110 like clockwork, and I'm getting about 34-38MPG. I goose it a lot, love to wheelie, and use a lot of engine braking. I hope that's what's making the difference.
bmweuro
Basic User
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:52 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Chico, CA.
Contact:

Post by bmweuro »

My fuel light just came on at 108 miles. These are the total miles on the bike. I am questioning how well it works. Most mornings it is on for the first couple of minutes I ride and the last 5 miles it flashes on and off.
Chris
User avatar
single650
Basic User
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:20 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Bedford (ish)

Post by single650 »

I've just got mine with 4000 on the clock.

I get 150 from brim full to warning light, working out at 10 miles per litre.
I was hoping for better when its loosened up some more.
rockster.ch
Basic User
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:50 am

my stats

Post by rockster.ch »

3722km on the clock, just been serviced and had a Wunderlich Trimm installed.....and have jumped from close to 7 litres per 100km to closer to 6.5...... that's 41 -> 43mpg.

And my typical run is my commute at 90mph on the highway. I can get *better* economy but twisties are not reserved for my journey to work....
User avatar
Lion_Lady
Basic User
Posts: 422
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:05 pm
Donating Member #: 1
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Contact:

Post by Lion_Lady »

My fuel light comes on at around 154 miles for my 'everyday riding.' I can well count on going to 180 miles before I actually start worrying about running out of gas (I have gone as far as 198 miles before filling up and added 4.5 gallons... which would mean just .4 gallons left, YIKES!).

For highway riding, longer trips, it comes on at around 168 miles or more.

I use 89 octane and don't really hammer the bike but I'm no timid tammy either. I regularly get between 42-46 mpg.

Since switching to all synthetic oils, the mileage seems to have gone up by a couple MPG.

Pam
Image
Tripton
Basic User
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by Tripton »

I could be wrong, but wouldn't that mean that there is .9 gallons left?
User avatar
\\Mike_Lea//
Basic User
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:54 am

Post by \\Mike_Lea// »

Never thought about total mileage... Mine has done approx. 5700miles, which isn't anywhere near run-in for 'BM from what I'm told. 16k is the magical figure from what I heard.

I'm quite a smooth, fast rider, so not sure if that makes the difference or not. Suffice to say the MPG are more than I could have hoped for !

Rock on !

M :)
Shine on you crazy diamond
toner87
Member
Posts: 830
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:39 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

25

Post by toner87 »

I do 95% of my riding in the city and get 25mpg, if I'm lucky. I'm a big guy and love blasting around in the city, but the mileage sure suffers.
User avatar
Lion_Lady
Basic User
Posts: 422
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:05 pm
Donating Member #: 1
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Contact:

Post by Lion_Lady »

Tripton wrote:I could be wrong, but wouldn't that mean that there is .9 gallons left?
I've seen two differnt tank capacities for the Rockster: 5.4 and 4.9. I go with the 4.9 cause I figure it'll keep me outta trouble.

P
Image
User avatar
daslimpet
Basic User
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 10:59 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Minnesota

Post by daslimpet »

My fuel light comes on when I've used 3.8 Gallons (U.S.). Having looked at the electrical trip mechanism when I had the pump out to change the filter, I would guess that is pretty consistent for us R1150R's be they rocksters or roadsters.

I know I've got up to 1.2 gallons of reserve before things get really risky, so I just check the tripmeter when I see the fuel light come on and do a little quick math in my head to estimate how many miles I can get away with before pulling up to a pump somewhere.

At 165 miles / 3.8 ga I know I'm getting about 43 mpg. So assuming the same riding style, windage, etc... I'll plan to gas up at around 210 miles on the trip meter.

With the Sargent seat, I'm not as anxious to stop as I used to be.. 8)
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence" - Napoleon Bonaparte
Post Reply